Henry Thoreau once said: "It's not what you look at that
matters, it's what you see." So let's clarify some terms and definitions
first, to make sure we are on the same page here and that you see the same
things I see.
When speaking about "logos" and "word
marks", it is important to realize that those terms are not
interchangeable, from a trademark attorney's perspective. There is a clear
legal distinction. By definition, a “word mark” includes words only. If a mark
includes some graphical/design elements instead of, or in addition to, words,
then a trademark attorney would refer to such a mark as a “design mark” or a
“logo”.
So if you have two separate trademarks (one of which is a
word mark and another is a logo/design) then those would be two separate trademark
applications. That applies even if the logo incorporates the same wording that
you use separately as a word mark. Assuming both the logo and the word mark are
used for exactly the same goods/services, then, yes, you would claim the same
International Class(es) in both applications.
If a design mark / logo crosses a certain originality
threshold, then it can also be eligible for copyright protection. The threshold
is not overly high, but it does exist. If you merely apply some minor
stylization to your word mark (e.g., the words appear in an unusual font) or
your mark consists of a simple geometrical shape (e.g. a circle) with some
words inside, then there might not be enough originality there to claim
copyright protection. On the other hand, if a logo incorporates a drawing of
animals, objects, people, etc., then it will be much more likely that the
originality threshold has been crossed, and copyright protection will
automatically attach to the logo as of the date it was created. There is a maze
of rules as to which logos are copyrightable and which are not, but I think you
got the overall picture.
As to word marks, generally they cannot be copyrighted, but
like with everything in life, there are exceptions. But that is a separate long
story.
A copyright owner is not required to obtain a copyright
registration for his/her work (since copyright protection is automatic), but it
is a very good idea to get a formal copyright registration as that provides
significant benefits (i.e., public record of ownership, which can negate
certain defenses an infringer might have, access to federal courts, a certain
level of protection against importation of counterfeit products, etc.)
Related post:
0 nhận xét:
Đăng nhận xét